The interplay of autonomy and affinity shapes moral decision-making

Abe Mathew, a philosophy doctoral student at MIT, emphasizes the significance of individual rights in safeguarding the autonomy we cherish. However, he cautions against overlooking the vital role of supporting and assisting others to avoid potential dysfunction.

In discussing our moral lives, Mathew underscores the importance of connection and reliance on fellow human beings for a fulfilling existence. According to him, understanding moral obligations and rights is key to how we engage with one another.

Mathew presents the concept of autonomy and affinity as conflicting forces, influenced by MIT philosopher Kieran Setiya. While autonomy distances individuals, affinity brings them closer, shaping the dynamics of morality.

The interplay between autonomy and affinity, as Mathew highlights, is fundamental in shaping morality and ethical conduct.

Examining the foundational idea in moral philosophy, Mathew delves into the Correlativity Thesis, which posits that every obligation to someone corresponds to a right they hold. While exemplifying this through a promise scenario, Mathew questions the universal applicability of the Correlativity Thesis.

Mathew stresses the essential need for collaboration in accomplishing tasks and highlights the significance of shared responsibility in his research at MIT.

Stressing the importance of moral values, Mathew argues that societal connections weaken when moral principles are disregarded.

Mathew’s research challenges the notion that rights inherently impose obligations, suggesting alternative perspectives on moral behavior.

Engaged in public philosophy, Mathew has led initiatives such as organizing events like the “Ask a Philosopher Anything” panel and heading the local chapter of Corrupt the Youth, a program promoting philosophy among marginalized high school students.

Emphasizing the reciprocal nature of moral obligations, Mathew advocates for a culture of “paying it forward,” where individuals support others as they have been supported.

Recognizing the role of forgiveness in the social compact, Mathew contends that moral theorizing should reflect the interdependence and vulnerability of human beings.

By promoting practical applications of moral philosophy, Mathew underscores the responsibility of individuals with privilege to assist others and improve social systems through acts of goodwill.

In striving for a world that fosters mutual benefit, Mathew calls for moral philosophers to contribute to creating a more empathetic and supportive society.