Student loan borrowers left waiting once more for additional assistance

This week marked yet another instance, and likely not the last, where legal obstacles hindered President Joe Biden’s flagship student loan forgiveness initiatives.

In rulings issued separately on Monday, federal judges in Missouri and Kansas blocked certain aspects of the president’s income-driven repayment program known as Saving on a Valuable Education, or SAVE. This initiative, which the Biden administration has sought to swiftly implement, has brought down monthly payments to $0 for millions of borrowers. The secretary of education often touts it as the “most affordable repayment plan in history.”

While the rulings do not reverse the approximately $5.5 billion in student debt cancellation the federal Education Department claims to have already provided to over 400,000 borrowers through SAVE, they do halt the program’s full implementation, originally scheduled for next week.

As a result, certain elements of the plan, such as reducing monthly payments for certain borrowers with undergraduate loans and zeroing out balances for those in repayment for a decade, are now in legal limbo indefinitely.

The White House press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, announced on Tuesday that the administration intends to challenge the rulings and appeal. However, impacted borrowers may face an uncertain wait for updated information regarding their debt forgiveness.

“We will persist in our efforts to lessen monthly payments and aid borrowers in alleviating the burden of student debt, regardless of repeated attempts by Republican officials to impede us,” Jean-Pierre emphasized.

Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, the leading Republican on the Senate education committee and a frequent critic of Biden’s student loan agenda, praised the injunctions, condemning the president’s income-driven repayment plan as unfair and reckless.

Amid the recent court rulings on student loans, the immediate implications for the more than eight million borrowers enrolled in SAVE remain somewhat unclear. However, based on the judges’ reasoning and the Education Department’s initial responses, certain conclusions can be drawn.

The US District Judge in Kansas, Daniel Crabtree, structured his ruling specifically around the SAVE provisions set to take effect on July 1, ensuring that anyone whose debt has already been canceled need not fear its reinstatement. On the other hand, in Missouri, U.S. District Judge John Ross deemed only the debt cancellation components of Biden’s plan as unlawful, allowing the rest of the program to proceed, offering significant benefits to the majority of borrowers.

According to the Education Department’s criteria, borrowers enrolled in SAVE are eligible to have their debt forgiven if they initially borrowed $12,000 or less in student loans and have been in repayment for a minimum of ten years. Additionally, the department will continue enrolling more borrowers who could benefit from SAVE, providing advantages like reduced monthly payments, zero-dollar bills for individuals earning $16 or less per hour, and protection from escalating interest.

While the Biden administration has canceled billions of dollars in student debt, the ongoing threat of legal challenges casts a shadow over these endeavors. Despite setbacks, the administration persists in exploring alternative avenues, including the SAVE program and a potentially broader relief proposal undergoing regulatory review.

The recent rulings have heightened uncertainties around Biden’s ability to deliver further forgiveness promptly, extending the tug-of-war between the administration and Republican state attorneys general seeking to dismantle the program.

As the legal battles unfold, the timeline for implementing Biden’s other relief plan, slated no earlier than July next year, remains subject to potential delays due to persistent legal hindrances.

.