Florida settlement provides some relief from restrictive ‘Don’t Say Gay’ law for teachers and students

Subscribe to

Teachers in Florida now have the ability to display a photo of their spouse on their desk, include books in school libraries featuring LGBTQ characters, and implement anti-bullying efforts to support LGBTQ students. However, limitations on discussing sexuality and gender identity in the classroom persist.

The recent settlement agreement, resolving a lawsuit challenging Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” law, has been welcomed by advocates as it lifts a “shadow” that loomed over the state’s schools. Governor Ron DeSantis, a vocal opponent of “woke” ideologies in schools, has also claimed victory in this resolution.

This agreement highlights the significant gray areas created by laws that restrict discussions about gender, sexuality, race, and history in educational settings. While federal law safeguards the personal identities of students and teachers, the laws intersect with broader state authority over curriculum and instruction.

Due to the uncertainties surrounding these laws, teachers in Florida have taken precautionary measures such as clearing out classroom libraries, removing Pride flags, and resigning from their positions. Additionally, there have been instances where students and educators faced prohibitions, such as a high school class president being advised not to mention his sexual orientation in his graduation speech.

Notable aspects of the agreement include the assurance that teachers will not be compelled to conceal their identities or inhibit students from expressing their true selves.

According to the terms of the agreement, the Florida Department of Education will disseminate guidance concerning the law to all 67 school districts in the state.

“The deliberate ambiguity of this law was strategic,” remarked Joe Saunders, senior political director at Equality Florida, an LGBTQ rights group involved in the lawsuit. “The lack of comprehensive guidance was only rectified after legal action forced an end to the most detrimental aspects of this legislation.”