Carlos Changemaker
A Texas university has initiated extensive staff layoffs following a ban on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in public colleges across the state.
The University of Texas at Austin has reportedly terminated at least 60 staff members from DEI-related positions as a response to State Sen. Brandon Creighton’s warning about complying with the anti-DEI law known as Senate Bill 17.
This move marks a significant step in the ongoing assault on programs benefiting marginalized groups within higher education institutions. Red states such as Texas and Florida have witnessed the closure of safe spaces for LGBTQ students and concerns regarding faculty and student migration to more liberal states.
The specific number of staff positions eliminated by the University of Texas has not been officially disclosed. However, insiders revealed that approximately 60 individuals have lost their jobs, with 40 of them from the Division of Campus and Community Engagement alone. These layoffs are scheduled to take effect within 90 days or more, according to confidential sources familiar with the terminations. UT has not provided a public comment about these actions.
Learn more: DEI continues to persevere at the University of Wyoming
Furthermore, UT Austin is liquidating the Division of Campus and Community Engagement, formerly recognized as the Division of Diversity and Community Engagement. In a communication to the UT community, President Jay Hartzell acknowledged the additional work needed to optimize talent and resources supporting the school’s core missions.
More: Insights into UT’s adaptation to SB 17: Guide by the American-Statesman
Hartzell highlighted the broadening and overlap of programs due to the new law, emphasizing the restructuring to streamline student-oriented services and direct resources towards educational and research endeavors.
Following these adjustments, the remaining programs will be integrated into other divisions, redirecting previously allocated DEI funding to support teaching and research. Although staff positions focused on DEI will no longer be funded, student support services will remain active for the semester.
More: Personal reflections on Texas professors and students amidst the DEI restriction
Moreover, Hartzell assured that the Division of Student Affairs will provide continued support for students and student workers affected by these changes. Displaced staff will be offered opportunities to apply for existing positions within the university, with available resources to assist them.
There is no clarity on the number or nature of eliminated programs and positions, and responses from other UT campuses are pending regarding similar actions.
In recent years, conservative criticism has intensified towards diversity, equity, and inclusion programs within higher education policies.
As per the Chronicle of Higher Education, over 80 DEI-related bills have been introduced nationwide since 2023, with many aimed at dismantling such initiatives. Approximately two dozen of these bills have either been enacted or approved legislatively.
States like Florida and Texas have witnessed severe threats to DEI programs, with strict laws barring funding for specific roles or training programs that support marginalized groups on campus.
Within Texas, SB 17 restricts DEI activities, offices, and staff positions in public universities and colleges. Senator Creighton’s letter to university authorities emphasized the need for full compliance with the law, warning of potential legal repercussions and financial penalties for non-compliance.
Described as the most extensive prohibition on DEI nationwide, SB 17 necessitates substantial operational changes within higher education. The enactment aims to reshape the fundamental operations of academic institutions, requiring diligent adherence.
Further Reading: Nebraska’s recent experiences with DEI initiatives
Reports indicate that a UT department chair was informed about the termination of an employee previously involved in a DEI role as part of the institution’s adjustments to SB 17 compliance. Such actions reflect the broader impact of the legislation on academic personnel.
A UT student recounted the abrupt termination of her position following the closure of the Division of Campus and Community Engagement. The resonance of these decisions within the academic community echoes the growing concern over DEI program reductions.
The University’s engagement with the community regarding compliance with SB 17 has been sporadic, with recent announcements emphasizing operational changes aligned with the law.
Bibi Macias, a senior at UT Austin, expressed dismay over the staff layoffs and closure of the Division of Campus and Community Engagement, emphasizing the adverse impact on critical support services.
Macias highlighted the essential role of the Community Engagement Division in supporting students, raising concerns about the welfare of staff members and student communities affected by these changes.
Students and faculty have criticized the perceived overcompliance with SB 17 regulations, citing the loss of vital programs and resources that catered to diverse student populations. The enforcement of such laws has stirred debate on the broader implications for student recruitment and success rates.
Political sentiments surrounding the elimination of DEI programs suggest a continued effort to counter perceived “woke” ideologies in academic settings. The legislative push against identity politics in higher education remains a point of contention.
As UT adjusts to the new mandates, significant shifts in program structures and support systems have become apparent, reflecting the broader impact of legislative frameworks on campus operations.
“With its expertise and diverse offerings, the Division of Campus and Community Engagement has been central to UT’s adaptability in evolving academic landscapes,” emphasized LaToya Smith, the vice president of campus and community engagement, highlighting the unit’s commitment to community-driven initiatives.
Macias underscored the growing pressure on students to sustain safe spaces and support networks amidst the evolving academic landscape shaped by legislative changes. The absence of previous resources poses challenges for future student cohorts, prompting critical reflections on institutional adaptability and support mechanisms concerning marginalized student groups.
During this summer, a team of students from MIT embarked on a journey to the sou …
Post-completion of their exams and papers, students at New Hampshire’s community …
The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) made an announc …
